asked 99.1k views
1 vote
those who agreed with this point of view were , bill of rights are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution but would be dangerous

asked
User Glw
by
8.9k points

2 Answers

1 vote

Answer: Federalists

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Alex Tingle
by
7.5k points
4 votes

Answer:

Federalists

Step-by-step explanation:

Federalists believed a Bill of Rights was unnecessary because the national government had only those powers granted by the Constitution, so the government wouldn't be able to deprive the people of their basic freedoms.

The Bill of Rights was only added to comfort the anti-federalists who believed the Constitution gave too much power to the central government.

answered
User Ronny Vindenes
by
8.0k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.