asked 120k views
3 votes
Are the bill of rights necessary

asked
User TorokLev
by
7.8k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Dequis
by
7.7k points
5 votes

Answer:

Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

answered
User Thiago Lewin
by
8.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.