asked 182k views
5 votes
Why wasn’t a Bill of Rights added to the original Constitution?

asked
User Fuzes
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer: James Madison and other supporters of the Constitution argued that a bill of rights wasn't necessary because - “the government can only exert the powers specified by the Constitution.” But they agreed to consider adding amendments when ratification was in danger in the key state of Massachusetts.

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Garzahd
by
8.1k points
4 votes

Answer:

Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

Step-by-step explanation:

at least of what i learned

answered
User Christoph Sommer
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.