asked 134k views
1 vote
The true average diameter of ball bearings of a certain type is supposed to be 0.5 in. A one-sample t test will be carried out to see whether this is the case. What conclusion is appropriate in each of the following situations?

(a) n = 15, t = 1.66, a = 0.05
a. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
b. Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
c. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
d. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
(b) n = 15, t = 1.66, a = 0.05
a. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
b. Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
c. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
d. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
(c) n = 26, t = 2.55, a = 0.01
a. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
b. Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
c. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
d. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
(d) n = 26, t = 3.95
a. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
b. Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
c. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
d. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in
You may need to use the appropriate table in the Appendix of Tables to answer this question.

asked
User Shehary
by
8.8k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

Option C - Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in

Explanation:

We are given;

n = 15

t-value = 1.66

Significance level;α = 0.05

So, DF = n - 1 = 15 - 1 = 14

From the one-sample t - table attached, we can see that the p - value of 0.06 at a t-value of 1.66 and a DF of 14

Now, since the P-value is 0.06,it is greater than the significance level of 0.05. Thus we do not reject the null hypothesis. We conclude that there is not sufficient evidence that the true diameter differs from 0.5 in.

The true average diameter of ball bearings of a certain type is supposed to be 0.5 in-example-1
answered
User Akarsh M
by
9.1k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.