asked 211k views
4 votes
What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)??

A) Criminal defendants who could not afford an attorney had to be provided with one for free.

B) People who were being arrested had to be informed of their Constitutional rights.

C) Prosecutors could no longer engage in plea bargaining with defense attorneys.

D) Evidence obtained in an unconstitutional manner could not be used in court.

asked
User Aardvark
by
8.7k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer: People who were being arrested had to be informed of their constitutional rights.

Explanation: The previous answer is correct, but it did not have the same lettering and choices as mine. I took the test and got this one right. The answer for me was C: People who were being arrested had to be informed of their constitutional rights.

answered
User Modou
by
8.2k points
6 votes
The correct answer is B. Look it up online :)
answered
User Ishwr
by
8.0k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.