The lawer presented a clear argument to the jury it was unbelivable how influenced they were by his case in the hopes of winning the trial. Which is the best revision of the sen…

Question

asked Mar 21, 2021 194k views

2 Answers

Kecman · Answer 1 · 2021-03-22T18:20:12+0000

Answer:

the argument presented by the lawyer was clear and vivid that he had a clear chance of winning the trial.

Step-by-step explanation:

Vishnu Upadhyay · Answer 2 · 2021-03-26T11:50:41+0000

Answer:

B) The lawyer presented a clear argument to the jury—it was unbelievable how influenced they were by his case—in hope of winning the trial.

Step-by-step explanation: