asked 66.4k views
4 votes
Read this inference: "Holmes does not think it was an accident the dog was covered in phosphorus." What textual evidence best supports this inference? A.the creature gave a hideous howl B.its muzzle and hackles and dewlap were outlined in flickering flame C."A cunning preparation of it," said Holmes. D.its cruel eyes were ringed with fire

asked
User Lenissa
by
9.1k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

C."A cunning preparation of it," said Holmes.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the book, The Hound of the Baskervilles, Holmes attempts to solve the mystery of a large beast that runs rampage and kills people at will.

He discovers that it was not an accident that the dog was covered in phosphorous because it was cleverly prepared.

answered
User Jay Modi
by
7.9k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.