Paulo wrote an article in favor of letting the history club use the library after school instead of the writing club, since the history club needs to use the library’s history b…

Question

asked May 15, 2021 63.9k views

Paulo wrote an article in favor of letting the history club use the library after school instead of the writing club, since the history club needs to use the library’s history books. He then found a study stating that having open access to books drastically improves students’ writing skills, since it enables them to draw inspiration from books, check sources, and compare their efforts with other writers’. How should Paulo adjust his argument based on this new information? He should revise his article in favor of allowing the two groups to take turns using the library. He should argue that the school started its history club years before it formed the writing club. He should ask the librarians which club is better behaved when they are studying in the library. He should demonstrate that the history club currently has more members than the writing club.