Question

I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous.

—Alexander Hamilton, the Federalist Paper 84


What point is Alexander Hamilton making?
A.
The Constitution did not need a bill of rights.
B.
A bill of rights was necessary for ratification.
C.
The Constitution is stronger with a bill of rights.

Answer 1

C js do it dude trust me

Answer 2

C because the federalist papers were all about supporting the bill of rights and backing the constitution