asked 14.2k views
1 vote
an economist would explain reece’s decision to be – because she – the prepaid cost, and made her decision based on the marginal benefit and cost of going. in economics these prepaid costs would be referred to as – costs, which are unrecoverable.

asked
User Tomalex
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

An economist would explain Reece’s decision to be rational because she ignored the prepaid cost, and made her decision based on the marginal benefit and cost of going. In economics, these prepaid costs would be referred to as sunk costs, which are unrecoverable.

answered
User Tavison
by
8.6k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.