asked 171k views
1 vote
Rosalind Franklin played an important role in the discovery of DNA's structure. Her data was used to support Watson's and Crick's hypothesis that DNA had the structure of a double helix. Even with this data and support from other scientists, the structure of DNA was not a widely accepted theory. Select all of the reasons why was their discovery was not considered a theory at the time of the paper's publication? 1. A newly released hypothesis must wait a least a year before the scientific community can vote for it to become a theory. 2. Theories are never developed by three people. 3. Theories need to undergo peer-review. 4.The hypothesis wasn't supported by their own data.

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

The correct option is;

3. Theories need to undergo peer-review

Explanation:

Within the scientific community, a theory has to be peer-reviewed by subject matter experts before it can be normally considered a valid theory. The peer-review process is one in which another scientific expert on the subject analyze, study, and repeat the experiments in the same conditions as stated in a publication submitted to a journal as a theory. The peer-review process aims to confirm the theory. A discovery which survives the peer review process will be considered a scientific theory and can then be expanded upon.

answered
User Maxim Imakaev
by
8.0k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.