Question

What prevents written history, including primary sources, from being completely objective?

What aspects of history do people disagree about? What factors cause this disagreement?

Answer 1

Answer:The real objective nature of writing history is to try to address the facts, as every side had seen the event, and never to choose a side that you may personally agree with. For example, it is a matter of who won, which determined War Crimes at Nuremberg.

Questions of the selection and relevance of evidence.

The method and the techniques of history.

Ideology and political predisposition.

The purpose for which history is studied in the first place.

More recently, arguments about the validity of historical method.

Explanation: yea

Answer 2

The real objective nature of writing history is to try to address the facts, as every side had seen the event, and never to choose a side that you may personally agree with. For example, it is a matter of who won, which determined War Crimes at Nuremberg.

Questions of the selection and relevance of evidence.

The method and the techniques of history.

Ideology and political predisposition.

The purpose for which history is studied in the first place.

More recently, arguments about the validity of historical method.

Step-by-step explanation: