asked 153k views
3 votes
p → ¬q use the conditional-disjunction equivalence to find an equivalent compound proposition that does not involve conditionals

asked
User Toffor
by
6.9k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

¬p ∨ ¬q

Explanation:

Since p → q is equivalent to ¬p ∨ q, just invert q

Using DeMorgans theorem, you could also write it as ¬(p ∧ q)

answered
User Chong Tang
by
7.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.