Answer:
The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the United States Constitution, were concerned about what they saw as unlimited and dangerous grants of power to the national government. Two specific parts of the Constitution that were of particular concern to the Anti-Federalists were:
1. **The Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18):** This clause, often referred to as the "Elastic Clause," gives Congress the authority to make all laws that are "necessary and proper" for carrying out its enumerated powers. Anti-Federalists were worried that this clause could be interpreted broadly, allowing the federal government to expand its powers beyond what was explicitly stated in the Constitution.
2. **The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2):** This clause establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the supreme law of the land, and judges in every state are bound by them, regardless of state laws. Anti-Federalists were concerned that this clause could be used to suppress state sovereignty and allow the federal government to exercise excessive authority over the states.
These concerns led Anti-Federalists to argue for a Bill of Rights to be added to the Constitution, which would explicitly protect individual liberties and limit the scope of federal power. Ultimately, the Bill of Rights, comprising the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was added to address some of these Anti-Federalist concerns and help secure the ratification of the Constitution.
Step-by-step explanation:
if you need a personal homework helper dm me on ig, savant.carlos