Question

Which of the following is likely to be the most valid source of information about pollution? a) A website supported by manufacturing companies. b) An internal report by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). c) A website supported by environmental groups. d) A television news program. e) A blog maintained by environmentalists.

Answer 1

The most valid source of information about pollution is likely an internal report by the EPA, due to its focus on environmental protection and access to data.

Step-by-step explanation:

When searching for valid source of information about pollution, an internal report by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is likely the most reliable option. The EPA is a governmental agency focused on environmental protection and has the expertise and resources to generate reports based on comprehensive research and data. Manufacturing companies might have commercial biases, while environmental groups could have advocacy biases. Television news and blogs often provide summarized information and may not always delve into the scientific details.

Answer 2

The most valid source of information about pollution among the option b) provided is an internal report by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as it is based on scientific research and regulatory oversight.

Step-by-step explanation:

Among the given options, the internal report by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is likely to be the most valid source of information about pollution. The EPA is a federal agency with the responsibility of enforcing environmental laws and regulations, making it an authoritative source. Its reports are generally based on scientific research and are subject to peer review and oversight.

Manufacturing companies and environmental groups can have biases that might influence the way information is presented on their websites. Television news programs often provide accurate information but might lack the depth provided by a detailed report. Blogs maintained by environmentalists could also contain valuable insights, but they may not always be subjected to rigorous factual checks.