Answer:
The decision in Baker v. Carr (1962) had a significant impact on congressional redistricting in the United States. Here are four key points regarding its impact:
1. **"One Person, One Vote" Doctrine:** The decision in Baker v. Carr established the principle of "one person, one vote." This doctrine requires that congressional districts be drawn in a way that ensures roughly equal representation for all citizens. This means that each individual's vote should carry approximately the same weight, regardless of the geographic location within a state.
2. **Judicial Review of Congressional Districts:** The case clarified that federal courts have the authority to review and intervene in cases where congressional districts are drawn in a way that leads to significant disparities in population size among districts. This allowed for legal challenges to districting plans that violated the principle of equal representation.
3. **End of Malapportionment:** Baker v. Carr marked the end of malapportionment, where some legislative districts had substantially more or fewer residents than others. The decision required states to redraw their congressional districts to better reflect population distribution and provide more accurate representation.
4. **Accurate Voter Representation:** The decision aimed to improve the accuracy of voter representation by ensuring that districts were based on population size rather than outdated boundaries. This meant that districts would better reflect shifts in population and changes in demographics, leading to a fairer and more equitable representation of voters' interests.
In summary, Baker v. Carr instituted the "one person, one vote" doctrine and enabled judicial review of congressional districts, leading to the end of malapportionment and promoting more accurate voter representation in the United States.
Step-by-step explanation: