Question

(L1) Match the statement to each part of the e-mail to a prospective employer.

not using formal language - criticized former employer
criticized former employer - uses bold type & "references" is misspelled
uses bold type & "references" is misspelled - Fine as it is written
Fine as it is written - not using formal language
no confidential information in an e-mail - no confidential information in an e-mail"

Answer 1

This question pertains to the connections between various aspects of an email to a prospective employer. The matching is based on formality, criticism of former employers, bold use and typographical errors, and the understanding of email confidentiality.

Step-by-step explanation:

The matching based on the content of each part of the e-mail to a prospective employer is as follows:

• Not using formal language corresponds to Fine as it is written.
• Criticized former employer relates to not using formal language.
• The statement about Uses bold type & 'references' is misspelled matches criticized former employer.
• Fine as it is written is associated with uses bold type & 'references' is misspelled
• No confidential information in an e-mail corresponds to the same statement No confidential information in an e-mail.

It's pivotal while drafting an e-mail to a potential employer one must maintain formality, avoid typos and refrain from criticizing former workplaces to make a positive impression.

Learn more about Email Etiquette