Answer:
The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut was more democratic and separated government from religious authority, unlike the government in Massachusetts. It allowed all property owners to vote, regardless of church membership, compared to Massachusetts where only church members could vote.
Step-by-step explanation:
The government outlined in the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut (FOC) differed from the government in Massachusetts primarily in two fundamental ways. Firstly, unlike the government in Massachusetts, the FOC separated the government from religious authority which was a novel idea for the period. In contrast, Massachusetts firmly blended government and religion.
Secondly, the FOC allowed all men who were property owners to vote, irrespective of church membership. This was different from Massachusetts, where only church members could vote. Therefore, the government system established by the FOC was more democratic compared to the government in Massachusetts.