Question

The EPA requires all companies that incinerate waste to get a permit. Invincerator Inc. is denied a permit at all levels of the EPA. In a lawsuit challenging the EPA's denial, Invincerator argues that the permit scherne violates Article III of the Constitution because it improperly delegates adjudicatory powers to a non-judicial entity. Who prevails? Invincerator will win because judicial power is being delegated to an administrative agency. Invincerator will win because congress did not give the EPA an "intelligible principle" for guidance. "intelligible principle Invincerator will prevail because the technical nature of the question is well suited for adfudication by and administrative body. Invincerator will prevail because the rights at stake are analogous to ones traditionally adiudicated by Article III courts.

Answer 1

Step-by-step explanation:

It's difficult to give a certain answer without reviewing the case and its arguments. However, Invincerator will argue that EPA has improperly delegated adjudicatory powers to a non-judicial entity, and Invincerator may win if the court agrees that the rights of the case are traditionally adjudicated by Article III courts.