Answer and Explanation:
The president appoints people who are members of the same political party for several reasons in the context of Marbury vs. Madison.
1. Loyalty and Support: Appointing individuals from the same political party ensures a level of loyalty and support for the president's policies and agenda. Party members are more likely to share similar political beliefs and goals, making it easier for the president to implement their vision.
2. Effective Governance: Having a team of like-minded individuals can promote efficient decision-making and effective governance. When members of the same political party are appointed, they are more likely to work together cohesively, resulting in smoother policy implementation and coordination.
3. Shared Ideology: Appointing individuals from the same political party can help ensure the implementation of the president's ideological goals. Party members are more likely to align with the president's political ideology, making it easier to advance their agenda and achieve their policy objectives.
4. Political Support: Appointing members of the same political party can help the president build and maintain support within their own party. This support can be crucial in gaining legislative approval for policies, as party members are more likely to rally behind the president's initiatives.
In the case of Marbury vs. Madison, it is important to note that the appointment of people from the same political party does not specifically relate to this case. Marbury vs. Madison is a landmark Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review, giving the Supreme Court the power to declare laws unconstitutional. It does not directly address the appointment of individuals by the president.
However, in general, the appointment of individuals from the same political party can have implications for the balance of power among different branches of government. By appointing like-minded individuals, the president may seek to influence the direction of the judiciary and other branches, shaping policy outcomes in line with their political agenda.