Question

the legal assumption of free will and full criminal responsibility appears to be incompatible with the psychological assumption of

Answer 1

The Durham Insanity Defense

Step-by-step explanation:

U.S., 214 F. 2d 862 (1954). The defense set forth in that case is as follows: “[A]n accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect” (Durham v. U.S., 2010).