Answer:
Based on the search results, it appears that the question is related to a specific case study on engineering ethics and involves the utilitarian theory and duty ethics theory. Without additional information on the specific case study being referenced, it is difficult to provide a definitive answer. However, I can provide general information on the utilitarian theory and duty ethics theory:
Utilitarian theory is an ethical theory that focuses on the outcomes or consequences of actions. It asserts that the right course of action is the one that maximizes overall well-being or happiness for the greatest number of people. In the context of engineering ethics, an engineer using the utilitarian theory would consider the potential impact of their actions on all stakeholders involved and choose the option that maximizes overall well-being.
Duty ethics theory, also known as deontological ethics, is an ethical theory that emphasizes the importance of fulfilling one's moral duties or obligations. It asserts that the right course of action is the one that follows moral rules or principles, regardless of the consequences. In the context of engineering ethics, an engineer using the duty ethics theory would consider their professional and moral obligations and choose the option that follows these obligations, regardless of the potential outcomes.
Based on these general definitions, Engineer 2 should choose the option that maximizes overall well-being for the greatest number of people involved in the case study, while Engineer 3 should choose the option that follows their professional and moral obligations, regardless of the potential outcomes. However, without additional information about the specific case study, it is difficult to provide more specific answers.
Step-by-step explanation: