The correct answer is (a) No, the function for model A is a quadratic function that decreases faster than the function for model B, which is a decreasing exponential function.
To determine if model B will ever be lower than model A, we compare the decrease rates for both models.
Model A is represented by the quadratic function y = -0.5x^2 + 125, where x is the number of units produced. As x increases, the quadratic function decreases, but at a slower rate. This means that the cost decreases, but the rate slows down over time.
Model B is represented by the exponential function y = 250(0.95)^x, where x is the number of units produced. As x increases, the exponential function decreases faster. This means that the cost decreases, and the rate accelerates over time.
Looking at the costs given for the first 7 units produced, we can see that model A costs more initially than model B. However, as the number of units increases, the cost of Model A decreases at a slower rate than Model B.
Based on the patterns observed and the nature of the functions representing both models, the cost of model B will not be lower than model A. Model A, being a quadratic function, will eventually reach a point where the decrease in cost becomes minimal. In contrast, the exponential function of model B will continue to decrease faster. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.