Final answer:
Most of the provided statements about the media's relationship with politics have elements of truth, but the reference to the media as the 'Third Estate' is incorrect; it should be the 'Fourth Estate.'
Step-by-step explanation:
The relationship between media and politics is complex and multifaceted. The statements presented highlight different aspects of this relationship.
First, the assertion that the 2016 presidential election year started with most Americans believing in the media's role as a "watchdog" for political leaders is plausible, reflecting a traditional view of the media.
Second, the statement that the power of the media has transformed politics and vice versa is true, illustrating the dynamic interchange between media and political processes.
The third statement is false, as the media have traditionally been referred to as the "Fourth Estate," not the "Third Estate," which historically refers to the commoners in pre-revolutionary France.
Lastly, the statistics provided for 2018 regarding the percentages of Democrats and Republicans supporting the media as a political watchdog seem to suggest a significant partisan divide; however, the literal numbers appear inconsistent, as 82 percent cannot be "just" compared to 38 percent.
This could be a typo or misinterpretation of the data and requires verification.
It is crucial to recognize that the news media's role is often called the fourth branch of government, signifying its importance in maintaining democracy and holding government accountable.
With the evolution of news media through the advent of social media and the internet, the landscape has changed dramatically. The spread of misinformation also challenges the media’s gatekeeping functions and its balance of power with the political realm and the public.
Ultimately, the true balance of power between the media, the public, and political figures in shaping public policy remains a contentious subject, with various factors influencing the media's role as a gatekeeper.