asked 195k views
1 vote
Which of the following orbitals cannot exist? a) 2p b) 3d c) 4d d) 3f e) 162p

2 Answers

3 votes

Final answer:

The 3f and 162p orbitals cannot exist due to violation of the electron configuration rules.

Step-by-step explanation:

The orbital configurations are determined by a set of rules called the Aufbau principle, which states that electrons fill lower energy levels before filling higher energy levels.

Based on this principle, the following orbitals cannot exist:

  • d) 3f: The f subshell can only hold a maximum of 14 electrons. Since the electron configuration 3f already exceeds this limit, it is not allowed.
  • e) 162p: The number 162 implies that there are 162 electrons in the 2p subshell, which violates the maximum limit of 6 electrons for the p subshell.
answered
User Ooransoy
by
6.9k points
3 votes

Final answer:

Of the given options, 3g¹¹ cannot exist as an orbital. The subshell 'g' violates the rules of electron configuration.

Step-by-step explanation:

Of the given options, 3g¹¹ cannot exist as an orbital. The subshell 'g' does not exist in the electron configuration because it violates the rules of electron configuration. The letters s, p, d, and f are the only valid subshells. The subshell 'g' violates the convention of using letters from the beginning of the alphabet to represent subshells.

answered
User Tamarabyte
by
8.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.