According to Ryberg, if the motive for observation is the reduction of crime, then people's rights to privacy are potentially limited or compromised. In the context of balancing privacy rights with the goal of crime reduction, there can be a conflict between individual privacy and public safety. Increased surveillance or observation measures may be implemented to monitor and deter criminal activities, which can involve intrusions into people's privacy.
However, it is essential to note that the extent to which privacy rights are limited should be carefully evaluated and balanced with other important values, such as personal freedom and civil liberties. Striking a balance between privacy and security is a complex and ongoing debate in ethical and legal discussions. Different jurisdictions and societies may approach this balance differently, considering factors such as the effectiveness of crime prevention measures, the proportionality of surveillance methods, and the preservation of individual rights and freedoms.