asked 28.6k views
5 votes
Prompt

Making Predictions and Visualizing with “The Most Dangerous Game,” Part 2
Short Write: The Most Dangerous Game

This story is very wordy and full of description. It is tough to tell who is going to win the challenge. So, given the last scene in the bedroom and all that led up to it in the game - who did what to whom - and who won the game?

Start by explaining the original challenge and then explain how one character was sure they had won and why, but then explain how they were tricked...and then use inference with the final details to explain who slept in the bed that night and what that meant had happened to the other contestant.

Bonus points: Explain the psychology of why it was not good enough to just escape? Does that imply having some level of morals?
Please don't answer with a sample response or just something random off the internet.

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer

This took me a while

Step-by-step explanation:

In "The Most Dangerous Game," the challenge between General Zaroff and Sanger Rainsford is to hunt each other on the isolated island. The story builds up with Rainsford trying to evade Zaroff while navigating the dangerous terrain and avoiding the traps set up by the General.

As the story progresses, Rainsford becomes convinced that he has won the game. He thinks he has outsmarted Zaroff by diving into the ocean and swimming back to the chateau while Zaroff continues to search for him. However, Rainsford is ultimately tricked by Zaroff, who had been waiting for him in his bedroom.

In the final scene, the reader is left to infer who slept in the bed that night. It is strongly implied that Rainsford is the one who slept in the bed, as there is no mention of Zaroff being present. The fact that Rainsford had "never slept in a better bed" than the one in Zaroff's bedroom suggests that he had won the game and survived the ordeal.

The psychology behind Rainsford's unwillingness to simply escape from the island can be attributed to his moral code and sense of honor. As a renowned hunter, he believes that it is his duty to stand up to Zaroff and put an end to his twisted game. Additionally, Rainsford's pride and competitiveness drive him to take on the challenge and try to outwit Zaroff.

In conclusion, "The Most Dangerous Game" is a story that keeps readers guessing until the very end. While Rainsford initially appears to have won the game, he ultimately falls prey to Zaroff's deception. However, his moral code and competitive nature ultimately drive him to emerge victorious and put an end to Zaroff's game.

The psychology behind Rainsford's reluctance to simply escape from the island can be attributed to his personality traits and values. Rainsford is a skilled hunter and a competitive person, who takes pride in his abilities. He has a strong sense of duty and responsibility, which makes him feel obligated to stand up to Zaroff and put an end to his twisted game.

Moreover, Rainsford's sense of moral code and ethics also come into play. He sees the hunt as a barbaric and unethical practice that should be stopped. He understands the danger that Zaroff poses to society and feels responsible for stopping him.

Another aspect that motivates Rainsford to continue the game is his desire to prove his worth and superiority over Zaroff. The challenge becomes personal for him, and he sees it as an opportunity to demonstrate his skills and intelligence.

In conclusion, Rainsford's decision not to escape from the island can be attributed to his competitive nature, sense of duty, moral code, and desire to prove his worth. He feels responsible for stopping Zaroff and putting an end to his barbaric game, which ultimately drives him to engage in the challenge rather than escaping from it.

answered
User Yechale Degu
by
7.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.