Question

What are the major differences in Brutus and Antony's speeches? Which speech was more effective, in your opinion? Write 2-3 paragraphs that describe their of persuasive appeals, comparing and contrasting their speeches, and explain which speech was more effective. Provide specific examples from the text to supp your point. Use proper spelling and grammar.

Answer 1

In Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar," Brutus and Antony give two very different speeches following Caesar's assassination. Brutus uses logos, appealing to the audience's reason, while Antony uses pathos, appealing to their emotions. Brutus argues that he killed Caesar for the good of Rome, while Antony argues that Caesar was a great man who deserved to be mourned.

Brutus uses logos to appeal to the audience's reason. He argues that Caesar was ambitious and would have become a tyrant if he had lived. Brutus also appeals to the audience's sense of duty to their country, asking them to "think of Rome" and "reason with the worst that may befall." On the other hand, Antony uses pathos to appeal to the audience's emotions. He shows them Caesar's body and points out the wounds made by the conspirators. Antony also plays on the audience's sense of loyalty to Caesar, reminding them that Caesar was a great leader who loved Rome.

In my opinion, Antony's speech was more effective. While Brutus makes logical arguments, Antony appeals to the audience's emotions, which is a more powerful motivator. Antony's use of pathos is particularly effective, as he shows the audience Caesar's body and appeals to their sense of loyalty and patriotism. He also cleverly uses irony to undercut Brutus's argument that he killed Caesar for the good of Rome. For example, when he points out that Caesar left money to the people of Rome in his will, he implies that Brutus's claim that Caesar was ambitious and would have become a tyrant is false.

Overall, while both speeches are well crafted, Antony's use of emotional appeals makes his speech more effective. By tapping into the audience's sense of loyalty and patriotism, he is able to turn the crowd against the conspirators and gain their support.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

The speeches given by Brutus and Antony in William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar were both powerful and persuasive, but they were very different in terms of their content and approach. Brutus's speech was logical and reasoned, while Antony's was emotional and manipulative.

Brutus used persuasive appeals such as logos and ethos to make his case. He argued that Caesar was ambitious and that his ambition would have led to tyranny. He also claimed that he loved Caesar but that he loved Rome more, and that he had acted out of a sense of duty to his country. Brutus's speech was effective in that it convinced many of the Romans to support him and his cause.

Antony, on the other hand, used persuasive appeals such as pathos and ethos to manipulate the emotions of the crowd. He began his speech by saying that he was not there to praise Caesar, but then went on to do just that. He appealed to the emotions of the crowd by showing them Caesar's body and pointing out the wounds that had been inflicted upon him. He also used ethos by reminding the crowd that he was a loyal friend of Caesar. Antony's speech was very effective in that it turned the crowd against Brutus and his followers.

In my opinion, Antony's speech was more effective than Brutus's. While Brutus's speech was logical and well-reasoned, it failed to appeal to the emotions of the crowd. Antony's speech, on the other hand, was emotional and manipulative, and it succeeded in turning the crowd against Brutus and his followers. Antony's use of pathos and ethos was very effective in this regard, and his speech ultimately led to the downfall of Brutus and his followers.