asked 205k views
3 votes
I need help pleasee I need to answer these questions pleases

Listen to Kerry Washington perform Sojourner Truth's speech "Ain't I a Woman". Then go to ST's "version" at the Sojourner Truth Project's website. Compare the differences between Frances Gage's (the one Washington read) and Marius Robinson's earlier version (the one ST read). You can read them here.

Answer the following questions:

1. List 3 differences between the Robinson version and the Gage version of the speech.

2. Why do you think it is important to hear both versions of the speech?

3. How do you think the differences changed the way people (in the north and the south) understood the context of her speech? How about now?

4. How does hearing the differences in dialect change the way you think about the speech?





answer them in at least 10 sentences.

When women’s rights activists spoke out, who were they advocating for, white women or African-American women?

What are the distinct arguments that Truth makes in her speech?

What is Truth saying about women’s rights?

Who is going to give them these rights?

How does Truth’s speech reflect intersectionality?

What passages in the speech reflect this?

1 Answer

6 votes

The three differences between Marius Robinson's version and Frances Gage's version of Sojourner Truth's speech "Ain't I a Woman" are as follows:

In Robinson's version, Truth repeats the phrase "ain't I a woman" four times, whereas in Gage's version, she repeats it only twice.

Robinson's version has a more southern dialect, whereas Gage's version has a more refined, northern dialect.

Robinson's version refers to Truth as "Sojourner" throughout, whereas Gage's version refers to her as "Isabella" until the final paragraph, where she is called "Sojourner Truth."

It is important to hear both versions of the speech because they represent different perspectives and interpretations of Truth's words. Robinson's version was recorded just after Truth gave the speech in 1851, whereas Gage's version was written 12 years later, in 1863. Gage's version was likely edited to make it more polished and more suited to the refined, northern audience she was addressing. Hearing both versions allows us to compare and contrast the different dialects and interpretations of Truth's words, and gives us a fuller understanding of how her words were received and recorded at the time.

The differences between the two versions likely had a significant impact on how people in the north and south understood the context of her speech. Robinson's version with its southern dialect would have been more accessible and relatable to people in the south, whereas Gage's more refined northern dialect may have been harder for southern audiences to understand and accept. Additionally, Gage's version may have been seen as more "respectable" and thus more appealing to northern white audiences, whereas Robinson's version may have been seen as too raw and unpolished. Today, the differences in dialect and language may still impact how the speech is received by different audiences, and may influence how it is interpreted in different cultural contexts.

Hearing the differences in dialect can change the way we think about the speech because it highlights the role that language and dialect play in shaping our understanding of a text. The southern dialect in Robinson's version emphasizes the regional differences between the north and south and underscores the racial and cultural divides that existed in the mid-19th century. In contrast, Gage's more refined northern dialect emphasizes the universality of Truth's message and her appeal to a wider, more diverse audience. Hearing the differences in dialect can also help us appreciate the unique voice and perspective of Sojourner Truth, and can deepen our understanding of the complex cultural and historical context in which she spoke.

SECOND PROMPT

Women's rights activists in the 19th century primarily advocated for the rights of white women. African-American women were often excluded from the mainstream movement.

In her speech "Ain't I a Woman," Truth argues that women are just as strong and capable as men, deserve the same rights and privileges, and challenges the idea that women are intellectually inferior to men.

Truth is saying that women's rights are human rights and that women should be treated as equals to men.

Truth argues that women must demand their own rights and fight for them through collective action and solidarity.

Truth's speech reflects intersectionality by acknowledging the ways in which race and gender intersect to create unique forms of oppression and discrimination.

Two passages that reflect Truth's intersectional perspective are when she highlights her experiences as a formerly enslaved African-American woman who worked in agriculture and challenges the stereotype of women as weak, and when she highlights the ways in which gender and class intersect to create unique forms of oppression and exclusion for women who are poor or working-class.

~~~Harsha~~~

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.