Final answer:
Social role theory's predictions about mate preferences are generally supported by observations like the convergence of gender roles diminishing sex/gender differences in mate preferences, but financially independent women reversing the preference for earnings over attractiveness contradicts the theory's traditional view.
Step-by-step explanation:
When assessing mate preferences and their alignment with social role theory, several findings offer support, but one does not fit neatly within the theory's predictions. Social role theory suggests that gender-specific preferences are shaped by traditional social roles, with women often valuing earning potential in a mate due to historical dependency on male providers, whereas men value youth and attractiveness linked to fertility. Observations that financial independence alters women's preference patterns, the occurrence of age gaps in marriage favoring older men, and the diminishing of sex/gender differences in mate preferences as roles converge all endorse social role theory. However, financial independence in women reversing the preference of earnings over attractiveness is not a direct support point for social role theory—it might be considered a rebuttal to some of the theory's arguments.