Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Empirical laws are statements that describe regularities and patterns observed in the natural world. They are based on empirical evidence and are therefore not normative, which means they do not prescribe what ought to be the case. Here are some examples of why empirical laws are not normative in four academic disciplines:
Psychology: In psychology, empirical laws describe patterns of human behavior, such as how people learn, remember, and make decisions. These laws are based on observations of how people actually behave and are not prescriptive of how people should behave.
Sociology: In sociology, empirical laws describe patterns of social behavior, such as how people interact with one another in groups and how societies change over time. These laws are based on observations of how people actually behave and are not prescriptive of how people should behave.
Economics: In economics, empirical laws describe patterns of economic behavior, such as how supply and demand interact to determine prices and how economic growth is affected by various factors. These laws are based on observations of how people and markets actually behave and are not prescriptive of how they should behave.
Biology: In biology, empirical laws describe patterns of biological processes, such as how cells reproduce and how organisms evolve over time. These laws are based on observations of how biological systems actually behave and are not prescriptive of how they should behave.
Overall, empirical laws are descriptive rather than normative, which means they describe what is observed rather than what should be.