Question

Edward Hyde supported Hobbes' denial of morality being immutable and eternal.

A. True
B. False

Answer 1

The claim that Edward Hyde supported Hobbes' denial of immutable morality is false. Hyde's link to Hobbes' philosophy is not well-established, and Hobbes' focus was more on the social contract rather than moral philosophy.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that Edward Hyde supported Thomas Hobbes' denial of morality being immutable and eternal is false. Edward Hyde, also known as the 1st Earl of Clarendon, was a statesman and historian, and there is no clear link between his views and Hobbes' philosophy. Hobbes, on another note, is well-known for his work 'Leviathan,' where he establishes the foundation for political philosophy rooted in a social contract. He argues that in the state of nature, life can be brutal, and to escape this, humans agree to a social contract with a government that has absolute power. While Hobbes discusses human nature and government, he does not focus on the denial of immutable and eternal morality in the same way that later philosophers like David Hume or Jeremy Bentham might. It's important to clarify that the denial of immutable morality would be more aligned with Bentham's utilitarian approach or Hume's sentiment-based morality rather than Hobbes' social contract theory.

Answer 2

The statement regarding Edward Hyde's support for Hobbes' views on morality is false; Hyde is not notably connected to Hobbes' philosophical ideas.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that Edward Hyde supported Hobbes' denial of morality being immutable and eternal is false. Edward Hyde is not commonly associated with the philosophical debates regarding morality and the state of nature that Thomas Hobbes engaged in. Hobbes, in his work Leviathan, argued that in the state of nature, human life would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short without a social contract that establishes a government with the power to enforce peace and security. This notion led to his belief that any morality outside the power of the sovereign is not enforceable and thus changeable by the dictates of the sovereign's will. This is quite distinct from the views attributed to Edward Hyde, who was not a philosopher discussing the nuances of human morality in the abstract sense but is known for his involvement in British politics as a statesman.