Final answer:
The statement about using another person for sexual gratification is a deontological moral argument that focuses on duties and respect for individual autonomy. It relates to wider discussions on moral relativism, cultural practices, and balancing competing moral values.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement “No one should use another simply for his or her own sexual gratification” is a deontological moral argument. This type of argument is focused on adherence to rules or duties rather than the consequences of actions. Here, the implied moral rule is that individuals should not be treated merely as means to an end, in this case, sexual fulfillment. This is in line with certain ethical theories that emphasize respect for persons and their autonomy.
Moral relativism poses challenges to universal moral principles, such as those relating to human rights and gender equality. Martha Nussbaum’s criticism of moral relativism, particularly using the example of female genital mutilation, highlights the difficulty of accepting all cultural practices as morally acceptable. She advocates for reasonable pluralism, recognizing cultural diversity while maintaining a global standard for justice and women’s rights.
When discussing sexual behavior, it is important to consider the moral principles involved. The problem statement questions whether all sexual acts not aimed at procreation, such as premarital sex, homosexuality, and contraception, are immoral. This is an area of significant moral debate, reflecting on values like freedom, consent, and harm. The examination of arguments or positions on moral issues, such as freedom of speech in relation to internet censorship and child po-rnography, requires a careful balance between competing values, challenging the absoluteness of freedoms when harm is involved.