Final answer:
Natural Law Theory posits that actions aligned with natural laws are morally correct, but faces challenges due to varied interpretations of human nature and external influences. The criterion of consistency examines if the theory logically supports its principles and provides consistent behavioral guidance.
Step-by-step explanation:
Evaluating Natural Law Theory involves examining the criterion of consistency with considered moral judgments. Essentially, this theory proclaims that actions in line with natural laws are morally correct. However, defining what truly is 'natural' can be challenging since interpretations of nature vary significantly among individuals and cultures. Problems with the Natural Law Theory arise due to differing views of human nature and moral praiseworthiness. For example, while traditional views may highlight the positivity of traits such as the desire for truth or goodness, others like Hobbes consider humans to be naturally selfish. This discrepancy creates a challenge in establishing universally accepted moral standards. Moreover, the basis of Natural Law Theory has been contested by evolutionary theory and the complexity of human behavior, which is influenced by environment and education, making it difficult to deduce moral codes purely from nature. The criterion of consistency with considered moral judgments demands that the theory's framework should logically support its principles and consistently guide behavior. As such, moral evaluations within this framework must align with the understanding of human nature and provide a coherent method for living a morally good life.