Question

Differentiate between concurring opinions and dissenting opinions and where these opinions would be originated.

A) Concurring opinions are those of the majority, and dissenting opinions are from a minority of judges in a court case.
B) Concurring opinions agree with the majority decision, while dissenting opinions disagree. They originate in the Supreme Court.
C) Concurring opinions are unanimous decisions, and dissenting opinions are divided. They originate in lower courts.
D) Concurring opinions are those that express disagreement with the majority, and dissenting opinions agree with the majority. They originate in appellate courts.

Answer 1

Concurring opinions are written by justices who agree with the majority but for different reasons, while dissenting opinions are written by justices who disagree with the majority. Concurring opinions originate in appellate courts and dissenting opinions can originate in any court, including the Supreme Court.

Step-by-step explanation:

Concurring opinions are written by justices who agree with the majority decision, but for different reasons or on different legal grounds. These opinions originate in appellate courts. On the other hand, dissenting opinions are written by justices who disagree with the majority decision. These opinions can originate in any court, including the Supreme Court.