asked 218k views
2 votes
Baker v. Carr (1962) argued that the _________ requires a one person, one vote approach to districting.

a) Equal Protection Clause
b) Supremacy Clause
c) Establishment Clause
d) Commerce Clause

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Baker v. Carr argued that the Equal Protection Clause requires a one person, one vote approach to districting.

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer to the question is a) Equal Protection Clause.

Baker v. Carr (1962) argued that the Equal Protection Clause requires a one person, one vote approach to districting. This means that each congressional district should contain roughly the same number of people to ensure that each person's vote in a congressional election is worth as much as another's.

answered
User Tushar Roy
by
8.0k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.