Final answer:
The Indus Valley civilization did not have depictions of soldiers or warfare, indicating a lack of militaristic focus in contrast to other contemporary civilizations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Indus Valley civilization is noted for its lack of depictions of certain elements common in other contemporary societies. From the evidence gathered through archaeological excavations, it seems that the Indus Valley civilization did not have depictions of kings or temples. There is no evidence of elaborate monumental architecture, burial mounds for royalty, or significant artifacts illustrating dominance by warriors and kings. Instead, signs point towards an urban planning culture with advanced drainage systems, orderly streets, and standardized bricks. The spiritual life in the civilization was rich, involving ceremonial bathing and symbolic vocabulary, but it did not revolve around grand temples or elaborate burial sites for the elite. Furthermore, in contrast to the militaristic empires of the time, such as those depicted on the panels known as 'War' in Mesopotamian art, there are no indicators of military activity like battlements or weapons at sites like Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro until the very end of their history. This suggests that warriors or helmets, prevalent in other cultures, were not a significant aspect of the Indus Valley culture. Therefore, the answer to the question is that the Indus Valley civilization did not have depictions of soldiers or warfare.