Final answer:
Elizabeth Anderson would support compensation as the Luck Egalitarian response to the victims of brute luck, advocating for policies that level the playing field.
Step-by-step explanation:
Elizabeth Anderson, when discussing the point of equality in the context of Luck Egalitarianism, would most likely advocate for compensation to the victims of Brute Luck. Luck Egalitarianism is a philosophical view in matters of justice and economic distribution. It suggests that inequalities in society are acceptable if they arise from individual choices and actions (also known as 'option luck'), but not acceptable if they stem from unchosen circumstances, such as the family one is born into or natural disasters (known as 'brute luck'). The focus on ambitions and endowments plays a central role in this theory. Proponents of Luck Egalitarianism, such as Anderson, would argue for policies that compensate individuals for disadvantages arising from brute luck to ensure that true equality of opportunity is maintained.