For the final discussion activity in this course, revisit any student’s comment in lessons 26–29 of unit 6 to "peer review" his or her discussion post. When doing a &q…

Question

For the final discussion activity in this course, revisit any student’s comment in lessons 26–29 of unit 6 to "peer review" his or her discussion post. When doing a "peer review" of a discussion post, you should reply directly to the chosen post—the student’s comment—and include the following information in your response:

What is the central idea of the post?
What are the supporting details in the post?
How effective was the post?
What did you like best about the student’s post?
How could the student improve his or her post?

Answer 1

When conducting a peer review of a discussion post, consider the central idea, supporting details, effectiveness, positive feedback, and constructive criticism.

Step-by-step explanation:

When conducting a peer review of a discussion post, there are several key elements to consider. First, identify the central idea of the post, which is the main point or theme that the student is addressing. Next, look for supporting details in the post, which are specific pieces of evidence or examples that support the central idea. Assess the effectiveness of the post by evaluating how well the central idea is communicated and supported. Provide positive feedback by highlighting what you liked best about the student's post, such as their clarity of thought or strong arguments. Finally, offer constructive criticism by suggesting specific improvements the student can make, such as adding more evidence or providing clearer explanations.