asked 63.2k views
4 votes
Premise 1: all mustangs are horses. Premise 2: all horses are animals. Which of the following is a valid conclusion for the two premises?

asked
User Taruxtin
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The valid conclusion that follows from the premises provided is that all mustangs are animals, as this is determined by deductive reasoning.

Step-by-step explanation:

The valid conclusion from the premises 'all mustangs are horses' and 'all horses are animals' is that all mustangs are animals. This conclusion is deduced by combining both premises in a transitive manner. Since mustangs are a subset of horses, and horses are a subset of animals, it logically follows that mustangs must also be a subset of animals. This type of reasoning is known as deductive reasoning, a process where the conclusion is a logical result of the premises.

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.