Question

Why is the Schneckloth v. Bustamonte's 1973 Supreme Court ruling considered a seminal case?

a) It established the principle of voluntariness in consent searches.
b) It restricted the rights of the accused during searches.
c) It expanded the scope of warrantless searches.
d) It emphasized the need for probable cause in all searches.

Answer 1

The Schneckloth v. Bustamonte's 1973 Supreme Court ruling is considered seminal because it established the principle of voluntariness in consent searches.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Schneckloth v. Bustamonte's 1973 Supreme Court ruling is considered a seminal case because it established the principle of voluntariness in consent searches. In this case, the court held that consent to a search is valid as long as it is given voluntarily, even if the person giving consent is unaware of their right to refuse. This ruling has had a significant impact on how law enforcement conducts consent searches.