Final answer:
Complexity in cross-cultural negotiations arises in political and legal pluralism due to the multitude of competing interests, diverse moral frameworks, and the need for tradeoffs in creating public policy.
Step-by-step explanation:
Political and legal pluralism can make cross-cultural negotiations more complex because they introduce a wide array of competing interests and moral frameworks into the political landscape. The heart of pluralism is the presence of multiple interest groups all vying for attention and influence over public policy.
This can lead to hyperpluralism, a state in which the political spectrum becomes so fractured and crowded with 'static' that making clear, unanimous decisions that benefit the public interest becomes exceedingly difficult. In a pluralistic society, tradeoffs and compromises are inherent, as public policy is crafted through competition among various groups representing diverse interests.
True pluralism aims for a respectful multicultural environment but is often challenging to achieve due to inherent cultural differences. Moral pluralism suggests that reconciling different moral perspectives can be difficult, which only adds to the complexity of negotiations. The interplay and competition between different political and ideological interests can result in policies that are neither entirely representative of the public will nor entirely practical in their application.