asked 232k views
8 votes
Which statement best paraphrases Justice Zarella's

dissenting opinion?
The condemnation of any private property by the
government was unconstitutional.
The potential benefit of taking the property for the
public outweighed the owners' rights.
o It could not be determined with certainty that
developing the property would benefit the public.
O The property could not legally be earmarked for
public use while it remained privately owned.

asked
User KaHeL
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

It could not be determined with certainty that developing the property would benefit the public.

Step-by-step explanation:

Correct on edge 2021

answered
User Shien
by
8.1k points
4 votes

Answer:

C It could not be determined with certainty that developing the property would benefit the public

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Martijn Van Hoof
by
8.2k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.