asked 166k views
2 votes
Soldier Company and Cornish Inc. plan to combine resources to create a competitive advantage, but each company wants to maintain control over the assets it commits to the alliance. Which of the following cooperative arrangements should the firms choose?

a.Tactical alliance
b.Joint venture
c.Equity strategic alliance
d.Nonequity strategic alliance

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Soldier Company and Cornish Inc. should opt for a nonequity strategic alliance to collaborate while maintaining control over their assets without the need for equity exchange.

Step-by-step explanation:

The cooperative arrangement Soldier Company and Cornish Inc. should choose to maintain control over the assets they commit while creating a competitive advantage is a nonequity strategic alliance. This type of alliance allows each company to collaborate without establishing a separate entity, and without requiring equity investment or exchange, thus enabling them to maintain control over their individual assets. The key benefits of this arrangement include resource sharing, strategic flexibility, and reduced risk compared to equity alliances or joint ventures.

answered
User Mong Zhu
by
9.1k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.