menu
Qamnty
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Why does Jackson admit that secession may be a “revolutionary act” but not a “constitutional right”?
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Ask a Question
Why does Jackson admit that secession may be a “revolutionary act” but not a “constitutional right”?
asked
Jul 26, 2017
190k
views
1
vote
Why does Jackson
admit that secession
may be a “revolutionary
act” but not a
“constitutional right”?
History
high-school
Blayne
asked
by
Blayne
7.5k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
5
votes
because the constitution exists for the sole purpose of preserving the country as a whole something that secession wouldn't do
Brian Risk
answered
Jul 31, 2017
by
Brian Risk
7.9k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
← Prev Question
Next Question →
No related questions found
Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.
Categories
All categories
Mathematics
(3.7m)
History
(955k)
English
(903k)
Biology
(716k)
Chemistry
(440k)
Physics
(405k)
Social Studies
(564k)
Advanced Placement
(27.5k)
SAT
(19.1k)
Geography
(146k)
Health
(283k)
Arts
(107k)
Business
(468k)
Computers & Tech
(195k)
French
(33.9k)
German
(4.9k)
Spanish
(174k)
Medicine
(125k)
Law
(53.4k)
Engineering
(74.2k)
Other Questions
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search Qamnty