A scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based on ___. A. inconsistent data B. independent data C. unlimited results D. contr…

Question

asked Dec 2, 2017 56.1k views

2 Answers

← Prev Question Next Question →

Ask a Question

Fogedi · Answer 1 · 2017-12-09T12:09:24+0000

Answer: A. inconsistent data

Indeed, using inconsistent data in a research or more to support an argument will only jeopardize its validity. A scientific argument supported by inconsistent data will be considered invalid and unreliable. That's why there are several scientific ways on data gathering.

A scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based on ___. A. inconsistent data B. independent data C. unlimited results D. contr…

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

2 Answers

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Related questions

Categories

Other Questions