menu
Qamnty
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
The Second Amendment states,"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Infringed means: guaranteed enforced violated restricted
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Ask a Question
The Second Amendment states,"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Infringed means: guaranteed enforced violated restricted
asked
Sep 10, 2017
11.9k
views
3
votes
The Second Amendment states,"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Infringed means:
guaranteed
enforced
violated
restricted
History
high-school
Pintac
asked
by
Pintac
7.5k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
2
Answers
6
votes
Answer:
violated
Step-by-step explanation:
i agree with the prson over me
Bluenile
answered
Sep 13, 2017
by
Bluenile
7.7k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
5
votes
In this case the word "infringed" means "
violated," since indeed it is restricted in the sense that there are certain firearms that people are not allowed to possess.
MLSC
answered
Sep 15, 2017
by
MLSC
7.3k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
← Prev Question
Next Question →
Related questions
asked
Jun 2, 2017
150k
views
The Second Amendment states,"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Infringed means: guaranteed enforced violated restricted
Rongyan Xia
asked
Jun 2, 2017
by
Rongyan Xia
8.8k
points
Social Studies
high-school
2
answers
0
votes
150k
views
asked
Oct 17, 2021
140k
views
The Second Amendment states, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Infringed means restricted enforced guaranteed violated
Pocokman
asked
Oct 17, 2021
by
Pocokman
8.4k
points
History
high-school
2
answers
2
votes
140k
views
asked
Jul 17, 2024
103k
views
The plurality opinion in Virginia v. Black, written by Justice O'Connor, found the Virginia statute on cross-burning unconstitutional because a) It violated the Equal Protection Clause b) It infringed
Nikhil Vartak
asked
Jul 17, 2024
by
Nikhil Vartak
7.9k
points
Law
college
1
answer
3
votes
103k
views
Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.
Categories
All categories
Mathematics
(3.7m)
History
(955k)
English
(903k)
Biology
(716k)
Chemistry
(440k)
Physics
(405k)
Social Studies
(564k)
Advanced Placement
(27.5k)
SAT
(19.1k)
Geography
(146k)
Health
(283k)
Arts
(107k)
Business
(468k)
Computers & Tech
(195k)
French
(33.9k)
German
(4.9k)
Spanish
(174k)
Medicine
(125k)
Law
(53.4k)
Engineering
(74.2k)
Other Questions
What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search Qamnty