asked 177k views
5 votes
What arguments do Buchanan and summer make about the boundaries of Texas, the issues that sparked the fighting? Whose arguments is more persuasive and why?

1 Answer

4 votes
Buchanan contended that part of Mexico is viewed as a region of Texas. Parts of Texas can be discovered way beyond the Rio Grande and despite the fact that he believes that Texas isolated themselves from Mexico, he thinks that they claim parts of each other. Summer contended opposite of Buchanan, which is that there is no piece of Texas beyond the river. He needs to get the limit line drawn and go at the earliest opportunity. Buchanan's argument was more influential on the grounds that he upheld his desire with more confirmation than Sumner.
answered
User ReynierPM
by
8.2k points

Related questions

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.