asked 57.1k views
5 votes
In Cameron’s argument on the artistic value of video games, she wrote this introduction.

Roger Ebert once wrote an article titled, “Video Games Can Never Be Art.” In this article he wrote that no game is “worthy of comparison with the great dramatists, poets, filmmakers, novelists, and composers.” This may be true right now, but it’s inevitable that video games will rise to have just as much or more artistic importance than film, poetry, theater, and television. We’re witnessing the childhood phase of the dominant art form of the future.

Which of the following pieces of evidence supports her claim?

A.
The museum of modern art now includes video games.
B.
The video game industry is a multi-billion dollar industry.
C.
Advances in video game graphics are happening faster and faster.
D.
Video games are no longer the domain of children, as more and more adults are starting to enjoy them

asked
User Dayquan
by
8.2k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

THE PERSON UP TOP IS CORRECT

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Mathieu Renda
by
9.1k points
7 votes
I would probably say A. Being that the museum of modern arts have many famous pieces there and for a video game to be included it has to jave some artistic value.
answered
User Rakesh Mahapatro
by
8.9k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.