asked 1.2k views
19 votes
What did the US Supreme Court decide in this case?

Restrictive covenants could be decided on a case-by-case basis.
Lawmakers had the right to make racial restrictions in housing legal.
The Fourteenth Amendment supported the concept of a restrictive covenant.
Racial restrictions in housing were not constitutional and could not be enforced.

asked
User Fanton
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

prohibited the sale of property to non-Caucasians unconstitutionally violate the equal protection provision

answered
User Balpha
by
8.0k points
14 votes

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Racial restrictions in housing were not constitutional and could not be enforced.

answered
User Sandeep J Patel
by
8.6k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.